Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Videos
  • Submit an article
  • More
    • About JBIS
    • Editorial Board
    • Published Ahead of Print (PAP)
  • IPR Logo
  • About Us
  • Journals
  • Publish
  • Advertise
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • More
    • Awards
    • Article Licensing
    • Academic Use
  • Follow IIJ on LinkedIn
  • Follow IIJ on Twitter

User menu

  • Sample our Content
  • Request a Demo
  • Log in

Search

  • ADVANCED SEARCH: Discover more content by journal, author or time frame
The Journal of Index Investing
  • IPR Logo
  • About Us
  • Journals
  • Publish
  • Advertise
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • More
    • Awards
    • Article Licensing
    • Academic Use
  • Sample our Content
  • Request a Demo
  • Log in
The Journal of Index Investing

The Journal of Index Investing

ADVANCED SEARCH: Discover more content by journal, author or time frame

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Videos
  • Submit an article
  • More
    • About JBIS
    • Editorial Board
    • Published Ahead of Print (PAP)
  • Follow IIJ on LinkedIn
  • Follow IIJ on Twitter
Open Access

Editor’s Letter

Brian R. Bruce
The Journal of Beta Investment Strategies Spring 2019, 9 (4) 1-2; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/jii.2019.9.4.001
Brian R. Bruce
Editor-in-Chief
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

We open the Spring issue with an analysis by Rowley, Thomas, and O’Hanlon of the effect of time of day on the average bid/ask spread of an exchange-traded fund (ETF). Their findings support the argument that investors should avoid trading near market open. Their analysis does not support the argument that investors should avoid trading near market close. Unexpectedly, after controls, they find higher spreads during Federal Open Market Committee announcements, suggesting that investors should be vigilant when trading at such times. Shulman evaluates ESG- (Environment, Social, and Governance) oriented strategies and presents research which demonstrates that entrepreneurial organizations develop stronger governance traits compared with “typical” companies. Additionally, their analytics indicate that an entrepreneur factor exists, and is one of the most significant factors in explaining excess returns. These entrepreneurs also contribute measurable ESG benefits.

Next, Giese, Lee, Melas, Nagy, and Nishikawa focus on how asset owners can implement ESG integration through index-based allocations to portfolios that seek to replicate ESG indexes. Index-based approaches offer consistency, transparency, and replicability and are generally cost-effective. Over a seven-year study period, global and regional versions of the MSCI ESG Leaders Indexes (as proxies for regional allocations) resulted in significant variations in their respective ESG profiles and performance, but in all instances, there was a clear reduction in all key risk measures. Kumar examines information content of ESG from a factor exposure perspective. They find that most of the returns of the four indexes evaluated are explained by the CAPM market factor and different asset pricing factors are significantly associated with returns of these ESG indexes. The analyses show that there is no information content in the overall ESG score in constructing a portfolio; instead, asset managers should incorporate relevant parameters forming part of the overall ESG score in their portfolio construction. They recommend that institutional investors should perform their duty of helping poorly ranked companies, with regard to ESG, in changing their structural framework and thereby improving their overall ESG score, thus gaining through ESG momentum.

To conclude this issue, Henriksson, Livnat, Pfeifer, and Stumpp argue that if skewness preferences underlie the low volatility anomaly, then a naïve low volatility strategy should be dominated by one that explicitly targets expected return skew. This article recommends a multi-factor alpha strategy that is based on avoiding index constituents that are perceived to have ex ante high relative skew. The authors demonstrate that portfolios constructed to avoid high expected skew stocks outperform both low volatility strategies and several widely used US and global capitalization-weighted indexes.

As always, we welcome your submissions. Please encourage those you know who have papers or have made good presentations on indexing, ETFs, mutual funds, or related subjects to submit them for consideration. We value your comments and suggestions, so please email us at journals{at}investmentresearch.org.

TOPICS: ESG investing, exchange-traded funds and applications, analysis of individual factors/risk premia

Brian Bruce

Editor-in-Chief

  • © 2019 Pageant Media Ltd

PreviousNext
Back to top

Explore our content to discover more relevant research

  • By topic
  • Across journals
  • From the experts
  • Monthly highlights
  • Special collections

In this issue

The Journal of Index Investing: 9 (4)
The Journal of Beta Investment Strategies
Vol. 9, Issue 4
Spring 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The Journal of Index Investing.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Editor’s Letter
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The Journal of Index Investing
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The Journal of Index Investing web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Editor’s Letter
Brian R. Bruce
The Journal of Beta Investment Strategies Mar 2019, 9 (4) 1-2; DOI: 10.3905/jii.2019.9.4.001

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Save To My Folders
Share
Editor’s Letter
Brian R. Bruce
The Journal of Beta Investment Strategies Mar 2019, 9 (4) 1-2; DOI: 10.3905/jii.2019.9.4.001
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Tweet Widget Facebook Like LinkedIn logo

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Similar Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar
LONDON
One London Wall, London, EC2Y 5EA
United Kingdom
+44 207 139 1600
 
NEW YORK
41 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10010
USA
+1 646 931 9045
pm-research@pageantmedia.com
 

Stay Connected

  • Follow IIJ on LinkedIn
  • Follow IIJ on Twitter

MORE FROM PMR

  • Home
  • Awards
  • Investment Guides
  • Videos
  • About PMR

INFORMATION FOR

  • Academics
  • Agents
  • Authors
  • Content Usage Terms

GET INVOLVED

  • Advertise
  • Publish
  • Article Licensing
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe Now
  • Sign In
  • Update your profile
  • Give us your feedback

© 2022 Pageant Media Ltd | All Rights Reserved | ISSN: 2154-7238 | E-ISSN: 2374-135X

  • Site Map
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies