Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Videos
  • Submit an article
  • More
    • About JBIS
    • Editorial Board
    • Published Ahead of Print (PAP)
  • IPR Logo
  • About Us
  • Journals
  • Publish
  • Advertise
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • More
    • Awards
    • Article Licensing
    • Academic Use
  • Follow IIJ on LinkedIn
  • Follow IIJ on Twitter

User menu

  • Sample our Content
  • Request a Demo
  • Log in

Search

  • ADVANCED SEARCH: Discover more content by journal, author or time frame
The Journal of Index Investing
  • IPR Logo
  • About Us
  • Journals
  • Publish
  • Advertise
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • More
    • Awards
    • Article Licensing
    • Academic Use
  • Sample our Content
  • Request a Demo
  • Log in
The Journal of Index Investing

The Journal of Index Investing

ADVANCED SEARCH: Discover more content by journal, author or time frame

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Videos
  • Submit an article
  • More
    • About JBIS
    • Editorial Board
    • Published Ahead of Print (PAP)
  • Follow IIJ on LinkedIn
  • Follow IIJ on Twitter

Should Index Providers Be Regulated as Investment Advisers under the US Investment Advisers Act of 1940

Kathleen H. Moriarty
The Journal of Beta Investment Strategies Spring/Summer 2021, 11-12 (4-1) 54-71; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/jii.2021.1.104
Kathleen H. Moriarty
is senior counsel with Chapman and Cutler LLP in New York, NY
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF (Subscribers Only)
Loading

Click to login and read the full article.

Don’t have access? Click here to request a demo 
Alternatively, Call a member of the team to discuss membership options
US and Overseas: +1 646-931-9045
UK: 0207 139 1600

Abstract

The increasing importance of the index industry to the financial marketplace has drawn the attention of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The use of custom, foreign, and narrow-based indexes and self-indexing has generated regulatory concerns, including possibilities of improper index selection procedures, misleading index descriptions, inadequate or misleading custom index disclosures, and self-dealing. Suggested remedies include requiring index providers to register with the SEC as investment advisers under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (act). Historically, index providers have relied on an exclusion from registration under the act; this proposal queries their entitlement to rely on the exclusion. If index providers are required to register, it is unlikely that regulation under the act would prove useful. Rather, enhanced disclosure and the application of existing securities laws, including those dealing with disclosure and antifraud concerns, and current SEC investigative and enforcement activities in appropriate cases should be sufficient to deal with the SEC’s concerns.

TOPICS: Mutual funds/passive investing/indexing, information providers/credit ratings, legal/regulatory/public policy

Key Findings

  • ▪ Regulatory concerns are focused on possible abuses occurring in connection with custom, foreign, and narrow-based financial indexes, as well as self-indexing procedures, used by ETFs. These abuses include improper index component selection procedures, index manipulation, misleading index descriptions, inadequate or misleading custom index disclosures, self-dealing and blurred functions between ETF advisers and third-party index providers when creating custom indexes.

  • ▪ One suggested remedy is to deem index providers “investment advisers” under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (act). This result would deprive index providers of their current ability to rely on the act’s “Publisher’s Exclusion” and, therefore, require their registration with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), as well as subject them to the act’s regulatory provisions, including its fiduciary duties and obligations.

  • ▪ It is likely that index provider regulation under the act would not provide satisfactory solutions to the SEC’s concerns but, instead, would cause disruptive effects in the current financial index ecosystem, such as increased investor costs and diminished product innovation. Rather, the application and enforcement of existing securities laws, especially those dealing with disclosure and antifraud concerns and current SEC investigative and enforcement activities, where warranted, should be sufficient to deal with the SEC’s concerns.

  • © 2021 Pageant Media Ltd
View Full Text

Don’t have access? Click here to request a demo

Alternatively, Call a member of the team to discuss membership options

US and Overseas: +1 646-931-9045

UK: 0207 139 1600

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?
PreviousNext
Back to top

Explore our content to discover more relevant research

  • By topic
  • Across journals
  • From the experts
  • Monthly highlights
  • Special collections

In this issue

The Journal of Index Investing: 11-12 (4-1)
The Journal of Beta Investment Strategies
Vol. 11-12, Issue 4-1
Spring/Summer 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The Journal of Index Investing.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Should Index Providers Be Regulated as Investment Advisers under the US Investment Advisers Act of 1940
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The Journal of Index Investing
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The Journal of Index Investing web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Should Index Providers Be Regulated as Investment Advisers under the US Investment Advisers Act of 1940
Kathleen H. Moriarty
The Journal of Beta Investment Strategies May 2021, 11-12 (4-1) 54-71; DOI: 10.3905/jii.2021.1.104

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Save To My Folders
Share
Should Index Providers Be Regulated as Investment Advisers under the US Investment Advisers Act of 1940
Kathleen H. Moriarty
The Journal of Beta Investment Strategies May 2021, 11-12 (4-1) 54-71; DOI: 10.3905/jii.2021.1.104
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Tweet Widget Facebook Like LinkedIn logo

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • DEFINITION OF AN INDEX
    • BRIEF HISTORY OF US FINANCIAL INDEXING INDUSTRY
    • CURRENT STATE OF THE FINANCIAL AND MARKET INDEX INDUSTRY
    • RECENT EU REGULATORY APPROACH
    • CONCERNS PROMPTING CALLS FOR US REGULATION
    • US REGULATORY LANDSCAPE
    • CERTAIN REMEDIAL PROPOSALS
    • POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS UNDER THE CURRENT REGIME
    • ENDNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF (Subscribers Only)
  • PDF (Subscribers Only)

Similar Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar
LONDON
One London Wall, London, EC2Y 5EA
United Kingdom
+44 207 139 1600
 
NEW YORK
41 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10010
USA
+1 646 931 9045
pm-research@pageantmedia.com
 

Stay Connected

  • Follow IIJ on LinkedIn
  • Follow IIJ on Twitter

MORE FROM PMR

  • Home
  • Awards
  • Investment Guides
  • Videos
  • About PMR

INFORMATION FOR

  • Academics
  • Agents
  • Authors
  • Content Usage Terms

GET INVOLVED

  • Advertise
  • Publish
  • Article Licensing
  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe Now
  • Sign In
  • Update your profile
  • Give us your feedback

© 2022 Pageant Media Ltd | All Rights Reserved | ISSN: 2154-7238 | E-ISSN: 2374-135X

  • Site Map
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies